AI Content Ops for Agencies: Stop Writing Briefs, Start Publishing at Scale
Agencies are still stuck in the same brief-draft-revise treadmill even though the market is moving faster. Pressmaster‘s January 2026 pulse reports that 96% of companies now lean on generative AI to speed up production, and those teams are seeing 30% better campaign results and 35% cost savings when they let the machine handle research and drafts.
That’s why Kelly-TOD just shipped an AI Content Ops landing block for agencies and marketing teams (see task-manager/assets/ai-content-ops-agency-landing-block-2026-02-20-1254.md). It captures the entire loop: research-to-draft automation, brand voice lock, revision velocity, and quality guardrails that match what we promise at TO Digital.
Today’s article walks through that playbook, explains the ROI math for a 10-person agency, and offers the exact messaging we use to sell the idea before we talk price.

[elementor-template id=”6087″]
Until you automate the groundwork, a five-person editorial team will keep spending six to eight hours on a single 1,500-word post: research, SERP analysis, drafting the brief, squabbling over headlines, chasing client revisions. Team Grain‘s 2025 report pulls real numbers from content factories that went from weeks to 30 minutes per post while producing 5 to 10 times more assets with the same human crew. The secret isn’t replacing writers; it’s giving them drafts that are 70% finished so they can focus on strategy, insight, and polish.
ImpactPlus reminds us the world doesn’t need more content; it needs better content produced faster. Their December 2025 guide lists 14 AI tools that agencies use to keep motion, maintain brand voice, and move more quickly from idea to publish-ready versions. That split—AI does the heavy lifting, humans do the finishing touches—is the same mindset Kelly’s landing block codifies.
The block we just published mirrors the four-phase workflow any agency can ship inside a week:
The landing block also ships with simple distribution snippets—LinkedIn threads, cold email opens, and comment replies—so you can push this workflow to prospects and internal stakeholders without rewriting the same story every time. We keep those hooks aligned with the CTA we mention below, so every follow-up message sells the same outcome.
For a 10-person agency, the before/after math looks like this:
That’s the ROI Kelly highlights because it matches what ImpactPlus and Team Grain see in the field: the velocity boost is real, but the trust comes from training AI on voice and then letting humans add nuance and proof statements before publish.
TO Digital packages this into a voice audit: 20 minutes to map three clients, 48-hour turnaround on sample drafts, and a concrete plan to fold the automation into your existing content calendar. Once you have the audit, the landing block becomes the home for the next sprint—drafts, approvals, distribution, and measurement.
The bottleneck is still the brief
How Kelly’s AI Content Ops landing block breaks the loop
Agency ROI in the numbers
Before AI Content Ops
After
15 blog posts/month (two writers)
40+ posts/month (same team)
Six to eight hours per 1,500 words
Two to three hours per 1,500 words
Three revision rounds avg
One to two rounds avg
£4k–£6k/month per writer
60–70% output cost reduction
Burnout and churn
Writers polishing AI drafts instead of re-researching
[elementor-template id=”6087″]

